IBM 49Y6498

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIBM 49Y6498  (all builds)
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '19 at 01:19
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 140
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 407
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
XFX(1682 2920) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.44
1% 1.88 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 876GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 70 70 71 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
145% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 70.3
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 69.8
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 145%
Great: 145%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 319GB
259GB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 23 23 23 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
Read 98.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 22.5
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.8
20% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 49Y6498 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: IBM 49Y6498

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback