Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '19 at 16:00
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 31
2-Core 54.4
40% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 240
24% 198 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 33.1
21% 28.5 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 27
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 268 250 242 257 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.8% Average
Read 269
Write 232
Mixed 219
SusWrite 253
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 15.1
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 36.4
DQ Mixed 35.2
25% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 281 278 262 286 282 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 228
Write 248
Mixed 197
SusWrite 275
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 12.6
47% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 42.8
32% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 134%
JMicron 500GB
293GB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 27.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 13.3
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4
669% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
299GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 31 32 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 27.9
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 31.5
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
TrekStor DS maxi m.u 1TB
876GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 18.9
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 24.6
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
104GB free, PID a100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 18.6
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 12
22% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 44%
WD 5000AAK External 500GB
253GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 18.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 11.9
25% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 20%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
115GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 75 77 73 76 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 103
Write 76
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 66.2
103% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
45% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron-002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4E1 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 27.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback