PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
Memory | 60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180621 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '19 at 16:00 |
Run Duration | 245 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 72% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 268 250 242 257 246 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 281 278 262 286 282 MB/s
|
42.1%
Average
|
|||
JMicron 500GB
293GB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 2TB
299GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 31 32 31 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
TrekStor DS maxi m.u 1TB
876GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 24 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
104GB free, PID a100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD 5000AAK External 500GB
253GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
115GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 75 77 73 76 78 MB/s
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,065x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 449x |
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 238x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 163x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 138x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |