Today's hottest deals

Apple Macmini8,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple Macmini8,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2DFE22DDD8C
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500B
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 759
79% 634 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 85.3
Parallax 153
84% 114 fps
MRender 82.3
Gravity 122
Splatting 125
92% 110 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mknssdsr 1TB 1TB
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 222 103 318 191 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 317
Write 309
Mixed 292
SusWrite 194
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 12
45% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 33.9
57% 110 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Macmini8,1 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini8,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback