Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	24.1% Poor	Memory 39 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 89.9 32% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 51 8-Core 118 10% 84.6 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GACU 512GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUT10101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 199 203 202 215 177 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.8% Below average	Read 151 Write 148 Mixed 137 SusWrite 196 36% 158 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 8.3 21% 7.1 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 133 107% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 104%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 142GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 75 68 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 72 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 71.2 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.2 97% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 4x8GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16