Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '16 at 12:05
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 205
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 510
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 40.3
39% 44.5 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 36.9
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
69% Good
Read 506
Write 216
Mixed 286
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 18.5
96% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 34.4
58% 116 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69%
Great: 116%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
277GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 143
Mixed 130
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.29
83% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
74GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 71.5
Write 97.9
Mixed 92.8
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.14
38% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
14GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 75.3
Write 75
Mixed 79.3
58% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.24
81% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 87.1
Write 122
Mixed 117
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.21
71% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 86%
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB
38GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
Read 88.4
Write 71.3
Mixed 58.9
89% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.14
86% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
27GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 101
Write 87.9
Mixed 94.6
120% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.24
77% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 02FYPS-02W3B0 2TB
0GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25.6
Mixed 28.1
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.26
74% 0.82 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-D3H Builds (Compare 1,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-D3H - $333

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback