Lenovo 20E2000UUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20E2000UUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20E2000UUS
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180926
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 107
57% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2225) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 4.62
3% 5.44 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 7.43
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 284
Write 151
Mixed 218
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 24
76% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 92.9
DQ Mixed 94.7
77% 110 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT204864BF160B.M16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 10.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20E2000UUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20E2000UUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback