Minix N42C-4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMinix N42C-4  (all builds)
MotherboardMINIX N42C-4
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 21 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J4205
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 97.6
38% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 159
25% 178 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.62
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NEO-SSD-128GB 128GB
102GB free
Firmware: S0130B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 358 365 360 372 295 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.2% Excellent
Read 446
Write 365
Mixed 376
SusWrite 349
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 23.9
108% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 37.1
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N42C-4 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Minix N42C-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback