Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire SW5-271

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire SW5-271  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire SW5-271
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '16 at 20:54
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y10a
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 98.6
44% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 142
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Acer(1025 093D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 3.84
2% 3.59 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 6
4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT L8H-64V2G 64GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F861201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 445
Write 75
Mixed 131
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 8.42
45% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 8.62
16% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 15.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire SW5-271 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire SW5-271

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback