HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory0.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '19 at 21:02
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 B75
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 85.9
45% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 100
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
AMD(1002 1002) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 2.97
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.97
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD254GJ 250GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 36 29 27 28 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Read 8
Write 43.7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 25.4
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 37GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback