Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B820 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 53 1-Core 19 2-Core 40.4 27% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 39.4 8-Core 41 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 41.4 3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0558) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2849 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.69 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SVP100S 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJRA SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 192 188 194 198 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.6% Average	Read 189 Write 163 Mixed 121 SusWrite 184 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 23.5 70% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 53.4 DQ Mixed 27.5 24% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	85x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	71x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	7x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	5x
HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,180 samples	4x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16