Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom 330 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 16.3 1-Core 7.4 2-Core 14.1 9% 12.6 Pts	4-Core 23.3 8-Core 25.4 3% 24.3 Pts	64-Core 26.6 2% 26.6 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA A113) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.96 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 1.35 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB 4,861 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 58 64 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 111 Write 67 Mixed 100 SusWrite 59 19% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 15.7 56% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 81.8 62% 84.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMP125S6EFR8C-S6 Samsung M4 70T2953EZ3-CE6 3GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1639, 1639 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.06% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 1.93 GB/s	Latency 349 12% 349 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.06% Great: 16%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16