Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '19 at 09:39
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 74.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 917
84% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,356
84% 1,356 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 102
83% 104 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 97.6
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 250GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 235 227 226 217 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 455
Write 420
Mixed 378
SusWrite 237
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 37.5
126% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 261
161% 176 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 78%
Great: 99%
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB
60GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 204 121 83 66 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 425
Write 283
Mixed 145
SusWrite 121
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 25.8
92% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 166
119% 152 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 1.5TB
74GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 74 73 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 72.5
Write 78.5
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 72.7
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x10GB
1 of 1 slots used
10GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 29.4
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback