Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m7-6Y75 1,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 20 2-Core 19.3 25% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 44.8 8-Core 76.4 7% 60.6 Pts	64-Core 79.5 5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 119GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 148 143 152 144 190 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.7% Below average	Read 275 Write 192 Mixed 221 SusWrite 156 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 14.9 40% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 47 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 46.1 35% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 50%
Jmicron Generic 180GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1GB free Firmware: 0508 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 238 Write 194 Mixed 217 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 19.4 61% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 69.2 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 53.9 45% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 14.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	174x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	15x
SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GBIntelBench 64%, 3,152 samples	9x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	7x

RAM
2x4GB0Bench 58%, 1,733 samples	107x
2x8GB0Bench 63%, 1,950 samples	36x
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 6,118 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16