Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11DSi
Memory242.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180207
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 25 '19 at 10:22
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core
CPU1, 2 CPU, 64 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 35.3
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 168
50% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 658
58% 494 Pts
64-Core 4,989
309% 4,989 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 368 117 62 75 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 402
Mixed 393
SusWrite 161
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 48.7
161% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 268
202% 270 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
813GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 457 438 444 442 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 447
Mixed 447
SusWrite 445
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 50.4
166% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 270
202% 269 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40CB2-CTD M393A2K40BB2-CTD M393A... 256GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 30.4
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback