Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemEmaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A70FM2+iCafe
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 98.9
47% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 99
13% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 94.5
6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.69
4% 4.31 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 76 59 83 62 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 418
Write 310
Mixed 284
SusWrite 83.5
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 42.8
152% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 95.4
87% 131 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
234GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 93 111 114 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65% Good
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 72
SusWrite 109
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A70FM2+iCafe Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback