HP 510-p051a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP 510-p051a  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B4
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170531
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 80
2-Core 157
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 241
36% 260 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 M320
Device(1B0A 90F1) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 25.20.15027.9004
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 7.94
5% 7.29 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 5.87
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 57 63 41 43 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 75
Write 82.3
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 48.5
38% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 510-p051a Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 510-p051a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback