HP PPPPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PPPPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Boston
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 08:44
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5800
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 32.3
35% 46.9 Pts
4-Core 41.4
8-Core 41.3
6% 41.3 Pts
64-Core 41.4
3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.15% Terrible
Lighting 8.73
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 9.34
7% 8.64 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 8.22
7% 8.95 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
40GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 15 16 24 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 18.1
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 18.3
14% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 10 16 19 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 52.6
Mixed 13
SusWrite 14.9
24% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.4
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback