HP Mini 110-3100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Mini 110-3100  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 148A
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 16:19
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N475
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 12.6
28% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 12.9
8-Core 13
2% 12.9 Pts
64-Core 10.8
1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 37 40 37 38 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 14.6
Write 43.1
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 35.8
21% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.69% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 0.6
3% 1.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback