Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 6% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	2.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q550 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB230
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '19 at 10:01
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z670 21 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Memory 19.1 1-Core 2.2 2-Core 6.1 8% 9.13 Pts	4-Core 6.4 8-Core 9.3 1% 7.85 Pts	64-Core 9.8 1% 9.8 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 600 16 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fujitsu(10CF 16B5) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.6.3077 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.19 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.18 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFB062GMSJ 62GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: AJF10204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 14 13 10 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 16.8 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 13.4 5% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 2% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB Chip DDR2 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.86% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.67 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 327 12% 327 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16