Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 89 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 329 44% 329 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 140 127 138 120 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 264 Write 194 Mixed 219 SusWrite 128 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 19.8 65% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 128 110% 161 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 2x8GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.4% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	25x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	13x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 8GBSamsungBench 44%, 92 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	3x
16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 Kingston ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 0443 RMT3170EF68F9W1600 12GBMicronBench 31%, 4 samples	3x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $179