Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 06:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 175
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 358
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Gigabyte(1458 21C5) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 3.16
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0803B5a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 94 79 79 79 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 432
Write 387
Mixed 344
SusWrite 110
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 39.6
130% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 213
187% 280 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 145 141 142 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 141
Write 142
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 142
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLG42F-D8KBGG------ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback