| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A75M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111223 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 22 '19 at 15:36 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A6-3650 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
48.2%
Average
|
42% 64.1 Pts
|
20% 147 Pts
|
10% 158 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6570
PwrHis(1787 2308) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
|
2.3%
Terrible
|
2% 3.74 fps
|
2% 3.17 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 95 94 104 109 125 MB/s
|
59.7%
Above average
|
63% 87.2 MB/s
|
127% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29%
Poor
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
20% 6.83 GB/s
|
41% 98.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples | 18x |
| Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples | 10x |
| Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 8x |
| HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $407 |