PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
Memory | 59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180710 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 18 '19 at 18:52 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
|
6.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$50
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 177 171 176 175 179 MB/s
|
82.7%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 206 204 204 204 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
109GB free
Firmware: 2D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 54 56 56 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 2D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 57 58 58 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS72503 320GB
114GB free
Firmware: C70E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 71 74 73 MB/s
|
46%
Average
|
|||
ST350064 1A 500GB
250GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 145x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 114x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |