Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 95.5
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 184
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 461
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
EVGA(3842 2639) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.75
4% 4.84 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 129 126 123 107 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 142
Write 130
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 120
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 142 142 129 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 144
Write 144
Mixed 73
SusWrite 140
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 85%
Synology iSCSI Storage 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 3.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.5
Write 49.3
Mixed 54.8
41% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 6.1
1,033% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 26%
WDC WD40PURX-64GVNY0 2TB
3.5TB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 23.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 21.5
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Patriot Memory 32GB
18GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 11.6
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
82% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback