Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2378 15 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 39.7 1-Core 15.2 2-Core 29.7 20% 28.2 Pts	4-Core 88.1 8-Core 236 18% 162 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 48%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 120GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 80 93 93 98 104 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.8% Poor	Read 142 Write 91.5 Mixed 108 SusWrite 94.3 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 8.7 39% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 85.9 DQ Write 37.9 DQ Mixed 36.8 34% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x1GB 1,329 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 8 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.8 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16