ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 06064H3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 06064H3 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '19 at 03:58
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 486 49% 396 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580 5,936 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.82 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.92% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 0.72 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 3 3% 3.16 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.92% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 33 54 45 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 71.9 Write 61.2 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 40.2 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 36%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.1 8 8 7.5 8.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 5 Mixed 5 SusWrite 7.7 10% 8.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 8.5 7.5 8.5 8 6.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 3.8 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 7.8 10% 8.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0N NT2GC64B88G0N NT2GC64B88G0N 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.6% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 22.3 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback