Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	IBM Node 1, System Card (all builds)
Memory	250.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110606
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '19 at 09:51
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 2870 6 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 98.7 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 139 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 491 45% 376 Pts	64-Core 1,532 95% 1,532 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2990) CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 99.4 Reflection 106 Parallax 103 81% 103 fps	MRender 86.5 Gravity 95.8 Splatting 77.9 70% 86.7 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$35 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 194 198 195 195 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 212 Write 201 Mixed 160 SusWrite 192 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 27.4 91% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 79.2 DQ Mixed 41.9 36% 51 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70BH1-CH9 M393B1K70BH1-CH9 M393B1K70BH1-CF8 M393B1K70BH1-CF8 M393B1K70BH1-CH9 M393B1K70BH1-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B... 256GB 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.4% Above average	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 22.1 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 42.4 94% 42.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM