Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T52R 6 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 16.9 2-Core 17.3 28% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 17.4 8-Core 18.1 2% 17.8 Pts	64-Core 18.1 1% 18.1 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9803) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.28 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6SA1M128G1011 128GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: X230600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 160 131 218 214 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 227 Write 188 Mixed 143 SusWrite 174 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 14.7 50% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 56.3 DQ Write 45.6 DQ Mixed 48.3 37% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4138334331 1x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $27