Asus UX301LAB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus UX301LAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX301LAB
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 06 '16 at 22:06
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 38.7
30% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 243
22% 183 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A2D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4062
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 6.31
4% 6.16 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 10.2
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS6100S3128GD 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: S8FM08.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 468
Write 330
Mixed 395
88% 398 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 6.55
42% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 7.18
10% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 74%
Kingston RBU-SNS6100S3128GD 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM08.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 205
Mixed 386
50% 219 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 8.06
72% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 68.5
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 6.34
21% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 14.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX301LAB Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX301LAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback