Toshiba TECRA A9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba TECRA A9  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '19 at 16:28
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7500
uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 48.4
36% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 42.5
8-Core 49.8
6% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 48.5
3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 0002) 384MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1825
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.23% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 0.35
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.23%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP61
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 168
Write 107
Mixed 133
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 13.6
53% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 16.2
13% 19 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback