Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo CPU 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 181 63% 114 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 186 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 42.5 35% 39.1 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 30.5 29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 81GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,374 Write 1,078 Mixed 1,442 984% 1,298 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 26.4 4,240% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 63.5 DQ Write 50.7 DQ Mixed 60.1 542% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 17.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM