Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55D-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '19 at 08:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 560
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 105
51% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 86.5
8-Core 102
12% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Asus(1043 83B8) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 3.5
4% 4.34 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.13
2% 3.45 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 20 27 44 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 67.8
Write 62.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 30
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55D-M PRO Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback