Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 05:18
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Vega Graphics
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 460
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
Sapphire(174B E253) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 31.7
22% 29.4 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 32.6
24% 28.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,153
Write 2,511
Mixed 3,777
2,874% 3,814 MB/s
4K Read 110
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 98.3
17,369% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 259
2,466% 280 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 34.9
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 26.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback