Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 22:36
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 225
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 746
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 131
Parallax 112
97% 121 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 120
Splatting 101
86% 105 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata S510 60GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.6c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 59 57 58 56 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 232
Write 71.7
Mixed 109
SusWrite 57.9
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 31.1
121% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 69.3
55% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 53%
Adata S599 64GB
56GB free
Firmware: 3.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 66 65 68 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 171
Write 80.5
Mixed 106
SusWrite 65.2
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 29.1
114% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 84.6
68% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$36
233GB free
Firmware: R0802B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 126 292 986 992 986 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 51.5
Mixed 260
SusWrite 594
125% 577 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 9.1
120% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 10.1
76% 183 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 137%
Great: 228%
SiImage 110GB
33GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 42 48 57 56 59 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27% Poor
Read 99
Write 48.7
Mixed 63
SusWrite 49.7
14% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 14.4
54% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 62
50% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
449GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 135 136 136 137 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 164
Write 102
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 134
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
441GB free
Firmware: CC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 102
Write 49.5
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 113
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 35
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28.8
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback