Today's hottest deals

Dellinc. Venue 8 Pro 5830

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDellinc. Venue 8 Pro 5830  (all builds)
MotherboardDellInc. 06W5WJ
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 20:59
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3745D
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 28.5
30% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 58.2
8-Core 57.7
8% 58 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Dell(1028 0630) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4338
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback