Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 23:32
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6274
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 99.9
48% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 272
28% 223 Pts
64-Core 985
61% 985 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20.1
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
AMD FirePro V5900 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 0B06) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM 500GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 188 194 182 198 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 201
Write 192
Mixed 173
SusWrite 192
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 17.4
57% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 104
80% 109 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 117%
LSI MRSASRoMB-8i 4TB
30GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 137 125 124 132 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 121
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 146
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.3
220% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback