Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	119.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 01:25
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 158 60% 103 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 656 59% 496 Pts	64-Core 1,665 103% 1,665 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 158 Parallax 200 102% 161 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 175 Splatting 119 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM480 480GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 449 451 448 427 370 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 464 Mixed 406 SusWrite 433 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 43 144% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 358 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%
Hgst HDN728080AL 8TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2TB free Firmware: W91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 188 191 193 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 165 Write 173 Mixed 77 SusWrite 190 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.9 6% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%
Hgst HDN728080AL 8TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 4TB free Firmware: W91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 192 200 192 191 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 187 Write 187 Mixed 74 SusWrite 194 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.8 5% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 20%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 16TB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 4TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 338 326 340 324 335 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 327 Write 325 Mixed 100 SusWrite 334 197% 272 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 463% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 285%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6 5.4 5.4 5.4 6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 120 Write 3.5 SusWrite 5.6 31% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 40% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 16x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 54.9 MC Write 46.1 MC Mixed 46.8 141% 49.3 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R920 POWER Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
SSDSC2CT080A4 80GBIntelBench 60%, 377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GBHynixBench 89%, 32 samples	2x
M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 17 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4... 64GBSamsungBench 84%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16