| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180319 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 10 '19 at 15:26 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
89% 160 Pts
|
73% 573 Pts
|
43% 690 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 863B) 3GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.7%
Poor
|
19% 24.1 fps
|
24% 29 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 301 307 306 307 308 MB/s
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
87% 388 MB/s
|
105% 41.1 MB/s
|
203% 302 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
123GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 150 147 151 150 150 MB/s
|
87.6%
Excellent
|
100% 137 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.8%
Good
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF H310-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 420 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF H310-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 94x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 88x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 39x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |