Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD5-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD5-B3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 00:54
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 90
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 339
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 97.7
60% 80.2 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 58.7
54% 67.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 77 73 70 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 123
SusWrite 76.1
25% 109 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 24.2
85% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 33.3
33% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
888GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 168 167 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 128
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 166
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 114%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 30
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 2.2
28% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 18%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
337GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 29.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 2.2
28% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 20%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 26
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 17.5
33% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15%
Great: 20%
ST310003 33AS 1TB
547GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 29
Mixed 24
SusWrite 17.8
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68X-UD5-B3 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD5-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback