MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A95
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 00:42
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 117
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 401
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
PNY(196E 11D8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 67.2
61% 73.1 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 71
Splatting 73.6
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJF180A5 SATA 180GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LWDi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 224 229 242 224 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 392
Write 228
Mixed 244
SusWrite 228
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 35.8
134% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 134
120% 180 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
OCZ VERTEX2 100GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.35
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 101
Mixed 116
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 24.8
99% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 80.3
68% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 49%
Seagate ST3500630AS P 500GB
117GB free
Firmware: 3.BTH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 68.2
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 59.1
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$94
12GB free
Firmware: SN12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 128 102 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
68% Good
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 112
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
6GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 87 80 97 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 94.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 92.9
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
448GB free
Firmware: AP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 125 124 125 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 67%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95) Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback