Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DA3
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '16 at 21:06
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon W5590 170 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU Node 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 174 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 558 55% 452 Pts	64-Core 877 54% 877 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6970 9,594 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E182) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Lighting 28.4 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 29.9 23% 27.6 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 25.9 Splatting 30 22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 203 174 6833 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 113 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 117 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 93 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 318 (C2) HDA temperature 113 111 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	69.7% Good	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 101 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.19 80% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 936GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 141876720 (03) Spinup time 96 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 478 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 37239083 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 661 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 477 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 458759 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 61 606339108 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 405 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 627 (C2) HDA temperature 36 40 42949672996 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 14083197764246 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9211801329 (F2) Unknown 100 253 744460954735	92% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 151 Mixed 81.8 99% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.25 67% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 114%
ST350082 0AS 500GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 61GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 27.7 Mixed 29 37% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.32 58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 12 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 56.7 71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback