ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '19 at 03:19
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 86 1-Core 116 2-Core 211 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 598 59% 480 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Lighting 60.1 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 61.8 49% 64 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 57.4 Splatting 66.9 52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 59GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 26 26 28 38 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 314 Write 41.3 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 30.4 22% 103 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 4.8 34% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 61.8 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 8.8 14% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 31%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 349GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1164 921 916 902 880 856 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,104 Write 1,540 Mixed 536 SusWrite 940 232% 1,030 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 54.1 185% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 852 DQ Write 719 DQ Mixed 778 585% 783 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 302%
Asmt 2115 60GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 100 Write 17.5 Mixed 28.8 10% 48.9 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 5.4 48% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 65.1 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 11.7 16% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB 2,214 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.6 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 23.6 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback