HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '19 at 23:39
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 131 61% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 355 37% 296 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 21F7) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.27% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.78 1% 1.79 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 171 173 173 167 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 174 Write 171 Mixed 143 SusWrite 171 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 13.8 46% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 25.1 20% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 186GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 117 119 120 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 116 Write 41 Mixed 51 SusWrite 119 60% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 68%
Adata SP 900NS38 256GB 84GB free Firmware: 0117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.5% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 22.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 12.1 17% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 318% 2.23 MB/s

TOSHIBA MK6465GSX 640GB 182GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.9% Very poor	Read 29 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 12.1 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s

WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 243GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 22.7 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 10.7 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 52%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 125GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Read 28.5 Write 22.7 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 1.3 23% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 45%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 21 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 22.7 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 19.3 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 30% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 ID:02 9E CMY8GX3M2A1866C9 52GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 10.9 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	388x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	73x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	61x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16