MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '16 at 08:20
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 436
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 1788) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 67
48% 59.9 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 50.9
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 523
Write 226
Mixed 306
77% 352 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.93
55% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 116%
Hitachi HDN724040ALE640 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 153
Mixed 156
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.24
102% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
243GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 117
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.23
119% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
139GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 88.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 71.3
60% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.43
128% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
2TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24% Poor
Read 95
Write 39.4
Mixed 46.6
67% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.16
24% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 22.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 MPower (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751) - $444

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback