Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 06:55
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4020 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 53.3
36% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 51.1
7% 54 Pts
64-Core 78.9
5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.59 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 3.43
2% 3.04 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 4.9 3.4 4.1 3.5 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Read 10.3
Write 7.8
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 4.9
6% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A Samsung M378B5273DH0- 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 4.4
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-S1 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback