Asus G53SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus G53SW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G53SW
Memory	8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '18 at 03:42
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 137 59% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 341 36% 288 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 64 70 69 68 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 76.5 Write 81.7 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 67.6 51% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA MK2555GSX 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 13GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 29 Write 23.8 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 13.9 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HM250HI 250GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 10GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 29 Write 20.7 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 14.1 29% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 21%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 3,195 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 253GB free, PID 2312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 95 94 94 96 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 104 Write 38.2 Mixed 46 SusWrite 91.6 88% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%
SAMSUNG SP1644N 160GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 99GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.5% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 23.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 13.7 27% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 10GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.1% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G53SW Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G53SW

CPU
Core i7-2630QMIntel $230Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	28x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	6x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	36x
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	1x

SSD
Vertex 4 128GBOCZ $215Bench 88%, 19,372 samples	5x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV Hynix HMT351S6AFR8C-H9 8GBUnknownBench 51%, 11 samples	3x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353