Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8760w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1630
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2920XM
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 161
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 420
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5010M
HP(103C 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 0
Parallax 13.5
11% 8.83 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 9.53
Splatting 13.4
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 41 33 59 38 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 27.5
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 45.4
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback