Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5C-A02ES
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	47%
CPU Throttled	36%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2328M 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 56 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 27 26% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 50 8-Core 48.8 7% 49.4 Pts	64-Core 45.4 3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.81 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.13 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 193 206 208 211 211 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.7% Average	Read 213 Write 214 Mixed 218 SusWrite 205 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 15.5 53% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 107 83% 112 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CH9 2x4GB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	349x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	152x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	505x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369