Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 80.3 1-Core 48.5 2-Core 35.4 42% 54.7 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 87 14% 100 Pts	64-Core 93 6% 93 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D3) 1GB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 0.59 2% 1.94 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 2.39 2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 100 74 68 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 404 Write 390 Mixed 253 SusWrite 93.4 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 24.4 79% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 191 153% 218 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-107.A00LF 9905428-093.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.1% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 4.1 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM