bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3216 APU
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Memory 28.5
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 71.6
29% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 84.8
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
HP(103C 90B7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 61 59 58 69 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 309
Write 89.2
Mixed 256
SusWrite 59.8
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 23.2
72% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 81.6
62% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-2048MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB 3GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback